Members Directory

  • Profile picture of Darlene Minter
    active 8 hours, 9 minutes ago
  • Profile picture of mtejania
    active 1 day, 7 hours ago
  • Profile picture of saunterton
    active 1 day, 7 hours ago
  • Profile picture of David Wilcox
    active 1 day, 9 hours ago
  • Profile picture of Susann
    active 1 day, 17 hours ago
  • Profile picture of Belinda
    active 1 day, 19 hours ago
  • Profile picture of escorts
    active 1 day, 21 hours ago
  • Profile picture of abigailwatkins007
    active 2 days, 1 hour ago
  • Profile picture of Michelle Curran
    active 2 days, 8 hours ago
  • Profile picture of Lee Rosenow
    active 2 days, 14 hours ago
  • Profile picture of Dawn
    active 3 days, 11 hours ago
  • Profile picture of Jonatas Raineri
    active 1 week ago
  • Profile picture of Jeannie Sapp Johnston
    Jeannie Sapp Johnston - - "Hope everyone is having a great […] "View
    active 1 week ago
  • Profile picture of Diane M.  Mapes
    active 1 week ago
  • Profile picture of Lore
    active 1 week, 1 day ago
  • Profile picture of Ryan Sais
    Ryan Sais - - "So in contract law right now , loving it alot of breifs […] "View
    active 1 week, 2 days ago
  • Profile picture of Karena Sanders
    active 1 week, 2 days ago
  • Profile picture of Jamie Capodieci
    active 1 week, 5 days ago
  • Profile picture of Connecticut Paralegal
    active 1 week, 5 days ago
  • Profile picture of Pamela Starr
    Pamela Starr - - "Star Trek cited by Texas Supreme Court (http://sessionswithastarr.com/?p=38) In an opinion delivered in the matter of Robinson v. Crown Cork and Seal on October 22, 2010, the Texas Supreme Court cited Mr. Spock, effectively making him a legal authority for interpreting the Texas Constitution. In its opinion, the Court declares that “[T]his case concerns high-stakes issues far beyond chapter 149, principally how the Texas Constitution allocates governing power.” And further states: Appropriately weighty principles guide our course. First, we recognize that police power draws from the credo that “the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.” Second, while this maxim rings utilitarian and Dickensian (not to mention Vulcan21), it is cabined by something contrarian and Texan: distrust of intrusive government and a belief that police power is justified only by urgency, not expediency. That is, there must exist a societal peril that makes collective action imperative: “The police power is founded in public necessity, and only public necessity can justify its exercise.”22 (emphasis added) Footnote 21 reads: See Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan (Paramount Pictures 1982). The film references several works of classic literature, none more prominently than A Tale of Two Cities. Spock gives Admiral Kirk an antique copy as a birthday present, and the film itself is bookended with the book’s opening and closing passages. Most memorable, of course, is Spock’s famous line from his moment of sacrifice: “Don’t grieve, Admiral. It is logical. The needs of the many outweigh . . .” to which Kirk replies, “the needs of the few.” Live Long and Prosper, […] "View
    active 1 week, 5 days ago
http://paralegalgateway.com/members/